You are here

China is not happy

Submitted by Sheripov on Wed, 09/21/2022 - 00:04

Some people regard the election of a black president in the United States as an important change in American society, which means that racism in American society has been completely eliminated, and that it is an important milestone for people of all nationalities around the world to move towards a world of great harmony. The New York Times said that Obama's election had swept away the "racial barrier" in the United States, and some Chinese scholars also said that Obama's election showed that the racial problem in the United States had been diluted. I don't think so. First of all, the racial problem in the United States can not be solved, and there is a possibility of deterioration. If the race problem was so easy to solve, there would be no division between white and black people in the United States by now-they have lived together for hundreds of years, and they would have mixed blood. But the fact is that there is still a clear division between white and black. This time, if only whites had voted, Obama would still have lost. Some people say that Obama has created the highest support rate of the Democratic Party among white voters in recent decades. However, considering the unpopularity of George W. Bush's domestic and foreign policies in recent years and the unparalleled climate, geography and people created by the financial crisis, if Obama were a white man, I think he would certainly win among white voters. Again,collapsible bulk container, if you look at the scene of McCain's speech admitting defeat: almost all the people present were white, and when McCain congratulated Obama on his election, the whole audience booed. When George W. Bush stepped down, he made a speech warning Republicans not to hate Obama too much, which just shows that the resentment against Obama within the Republican Party is more than the usual regime change in the past. In my opinion,mobile garbage bin, some white people with strong racist ideas in the United States will become more "racist" because of this failure, and may be more likely to translate ideas into actions. Of course, a significant number of whites in the United States are basking in the moral superiority of their country's election of a black president, and recent polls in the United States show that most people are willing to give Obama more time to achieve results. But I think that if the joy of Americans is not quickly followed by the substantial benefits that Obama can bring to them, hope will soon turn into disappointment, and will their instinctive racism come back? At the international level, the international situation facing the United States is greatly complicated, and I doubt that Obama can do better. When Obama was elected, the cheers in Europe were stronger than those in the United States, expecting the United States to abandon the unilateralism and toughness of the Bush era. But can the United States solve its problems in the field of international relations by abandoning unilateralism and tough policies? There are several problems. One is Iraq. Is Obama prepared to fulfill his campaign promise to withdraw troops from Iraq and concentrate on Afghanistan within 16 months of taking office? Now many Americans who support him are looking forward to his promise. But if he did, plastic pallet supplier ,plastic trash bins, what would it mean for American influence and control in the Middle East? It's hard to say right now. What can be said now is that Obama is prepared to concentrate his forces on the front line of Afghanistan and Pakistan to strengthen the containment of China and Russia, which may be the right choice for the national interests of the United States. Another Russian problem is that Russia's challenging posture towards the United States is obvious. In his State of the Union address delivered on the same day that Obama was elected, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev strongly condemned the United States and clearly announced that Russia refused to disband three regiments of the missile force due to the deployment of anti-missile systems by the United States in Europe, and at the same time prepared to deploy the "Iskander" missile system in Kaliningrad, showing a posture of tough confrontation. Russia's confrontational posture has greatly complicated the international situation facing the United States today, compared with the golden age of American dominance after the Cold War. No matter who is the president of the United States, this is a difficult problem, and Obama can do better? I doubt it. It is precisely because Obama is a black minority that he will be more criticized and suspected than a white president if he does not handle international issues properly. Two million people attended Obama's inauguration ceremony, and the atmosphere was extremely warm.
There is no doubt that the United States needs a president like a rock star to arouse people's emotions and make them forget the embarrassment of reality for a while, when its people are confused today. Kelly, a really good rock star, made everyone's mood soar like a rocket at the scene, but when the show broke up, everyone had to go home and face the reality. I believe that no matter how enthusiastically the American people embrace Obama now, as long as he does not bring immediate and obvious benefits, the support and national unity that the United States shows for him today will soon turn into suspicion, criticism and division. The higher the expectations, the greater the disappointment. In these difficult times, with a minority president, success is immediate, otherwise it will quickly turn into a disadvantage, and he will not receive the kind of understanding and trust that a president of the majority background can receive. Most of my previous judgments are from the perspective of the United States. I have no intention to "jinx" the United States, I just express some of my doubts and remind you that there are other possibilities besides optimism, not inevitability. I sincerely hope the American people succeed. From China's point of view, what we need is to guard against the United States choosing war or instigating war in order to get rid of the crisis when there is a serious crisis. Therefore, General Zhang Zhaoyin's article published in the People's Liberation Army Daily on December 2, 2008, which advocates that "we must abandon the concept of" building a peaceful army and a peaceful army "and firmly establish the idea of preparing for war", is very correct and timely. No More "Roulette": a Substantial Reduction of Sino-French Relations This is probably the most embarrassing thing for the "romantic and open" people. In the face of the West, there is a voice in their hearts saying: We have worked hard to build a business, but aren't we close to you? How else are we going to get to the bottom of this? We are in a hurry to draw a clear line with the Maoists in Nepal (regardless of others calling us cowardly), and we are humming and hawing about many international events, just to erase the unpleasant memories of "foreign adults"? What "Sparta country",wholesale plastic pallet, what "Red China", we are doing our best to wipe out this, why do you still hold on to "foreign dogma". cnplasticpallet.com