Tolstoy's example turned into the story of a boy who
Cylophin RX Tolstoy's example turned into the story of a boy who has a frightening revel in with a wolf after which relates the story to an Cylophin RX target audience, filling the audience with the identical worry that he felt. For Tolstoy, that is the essence of artwork. The message is apparent and expresses a selected emotion. This might then appear to suggest that art which does not evoke emotions/Cylophin RX emotions isn't art. Can this be real? I am taking into account the Greeks who chose to mimic nature with their sculptures.
