The education system in Great Britain

Before the beginning of education, namely from the age of 2, the children attend the Nursery or Pre-preparatory School (an analog of our kindergartens). It can be either an independent educational institution or part of an elementary school. It is worth noting that it is because the kindergarten can be a part of the school, and a legend has arisen that children in the UK go to school from the age of 2. With the complexities of understanding the educational system in the UK, we come from the very beginning. Despite the fact that the compulsory age of starting the training is 5 years, children have the opportunity to enter the preparatory class at 4 years, called the Reception Year. This opportunity parents can use at their discretion. This is the first difference from our system. English parents who believe that their child is not mature enough can give it to school from the age of 5. In this case, he will begin his education no longer with the Reception Year, but with the first class (Year 1). In other words, such a child does not lag behind and does not outstrip his peers. At us as as if parents consider that the child was mature enough in 6 years, he goes to school together with 7-year-olds, and thus for a year ahead of his peers, but about this a little later. In the preparatory class, children are prepared in gaming and entertaining form for the start of schooling. In the offset of the general curriculum this year does not go. But not everything is so simple. For the sake of justice, it should be said that there are "complexities" in the English system. The opportunity to get to the Reception Year is not available to all children. In England there is such a thing as "summer children", that is, children born in the period from April 1 to August 31. They are considered "less ready" for their peers born at the beginning of the year. That is why it is recommended that they begin training at 5 years. According to the law, parents of such children have the opportunity to apply for admission to the preparatory class, but the last word remains for the school's leadership, which in most cases denies them this, motivating such a decision by reluctance to have a "knowingly lagging" child in the classroom. On this ground scandals often arise. Every now and then, articles appear in the newspapers, as some parents complain about the school leadership, which refuses to accept the "summer child" in the preparatory class. Despite this, the issue is still unresolved, as both sides are right in their own way. The school does not want to take a less mature child than other pupils, since, perhaps, it will distract other children. In the logical nature of this decision, it is difficult to doubt. But you can understand and parents. They are concerned that peers of their child who were "fortunate enough" to be born for several weeks, or even days earlier, will start their studies, and next year, when their child goes to school, he will indeed lag behind those who are This time the preparatory year is already finished. Nevertheless, the law is the law. And he says that the child is obliged to start school on September 1, following his fifth birthday. It's so true as students prefer to ask for help with their academic papers https://au.edubirdie.com/do-my-homework-for-money . A child born between January 1 and April 1 has the opportunity to begin training on September 1 following his fourth birthday. See also: Tips for beginners. What to look for when choosing a school. Schooling in England is closely associated with the biological age of the child. When enrolling in school, or changing the school, the class in which the child is admitted is determined by his age on September 1 of that year, when he begins his education. Sometimes it comes to an incident when a child, born on September 2, should go to school one year later or, in the case of a school change, to a lower class. The law exists, but it is not applied in all schools at all, no matter how certain "grief agents" convince you. Yes, indeed, the more prestigious and older the school, the more reverently it follows this rule. In my practice there was a child born on September 2, who was refused to admit to one of the schools on our list for this very reason, despite all the parents' attempts to "agree". At the same time, there are many schools, at times no worse, which are more flexible in approaching this issue. Here it is necessary to return to the previously mentioned peculiarity of "our" education, to the possibility of sending a 6-year-old child to school together with 7-year-old children. It is because of this that one of the main problems arises when a child is transferred to a British school. As we have already said, most English schools decide to enroll in a particular class based on the biological age of the child. But in this case it turns out that the child, despite the difference in 1 year, has already graduated this year in his native school, and, considering the situation in terms of the number of school years, such a child is actually "left for the second year." I am sure that the absolute majority of parents do not even notice this, no one talks about it, they have accepted to school and are well.