Yeah but I think the onus is on the reviewer. It definitely states how many hours record are there so they should be able to OSRS gold find that these reviews are either trolls or absurd. Obviously don't go and earn troll reviews on games due to this bizarre ass war between OSRS and RS3 but if you are reading reviews, have a moment and jump over those without a hours on record. That isn't what is happening and that is not the way steam functions.
The game is mostly positive which all matters. Obvious review bombs such as this aren't helpful so don't get shown to other people as far as helpful reviews with long hours played. Additionally curators advocating the game will toooons more. A handful of individuals review bombing will not do ANYTHING into rs3. Go to the osrs play store page, I am Certain you'll Discover similar amount of review bombs from idle dumb people who say something like"GAME SUX, died to cow"I feel like if you played the game and you've got a legitimately negative review then you need to post it.
That you shouldn't do it because it can hurt recruiting to our sport is not our duty. Jagex should get guinuine opinions on Cheap Runescape gold their matches. I play RS3 consistently. But at precisely the same time I think it has a great deal of problems. And the management of the game is corrupt. I'm more prone to leave a negative inspection even though I play the game.RS3 is not all garbage. However, I feel like the poor stuff added to the match outweighs the fantastic things added. If it had been less manipulative about getting people to invest their money in the store when folks already cover subscriptions then perhaps I would be more positive.
You always are bombarded with ads to purchase keys and stuff like this in RS3 unless you're an Ironman.A possible rs3 player is additionally a potential osrs player.