After the conversation raised by the clarification of the Egyptian writer Ahmed Murad about the differentiation between a story and a novel, a great many reactions spread that helped out what was communicated in his declaration, which incited us to make an article through which we research the authenticity of what was communicated and the reasons behind the occasions of conflict raised by the subject.
On the possibility of story and novel as demonstrated by Ahmed Murad:
During a gathering on one of the television programs, the Egyptian essayist who made the book "The Blue Elephant" referred to that the differentiation between a story and a novel is that the last choice gets through lies along with truth, since it is portrayed, and a short time later the narrator could give mind boggling nuances to attract the thought of the crowd individuals, but in fact This suggests that the story is substantial and doesn't contain lies, since the story of a story truly exists.
Honestly, this clarification contains various double dealings that can't be relied on, as the qualifications referred to by the writer don't exactly spread out the characteristics of these two kinds of record composing. This is the very thing that we attempt to detail in the going with.
What is the differentiation between a story and a book?
It very well may be on the whole correct to say that we said that the primary differentiation between the novel and the story by and large is the difference between their size and the amount of words, as the novel is greater in size, while the record style in the story doesn't take up a ton of words - so to speak - as it is common something like 30,000 words.
Anyway, is enough this to get a handle on the qualification between them? Furthermore, the improvement of for the most part short, thick books? Are there phenomenal techniques planned for the creative sort alone, or are there complex associations that make the issue of objective family member?
Subsequently, it will be important to go over the significance of both the novel and the story freely, and a short time later separate the differentiation between them from a significant essential and insightful perspective.
First: Significance of the book:
The Novel is described as an insightful kind that has a spot with stories, and is depicted by being a boring tale that relies upon confounding significant nuances, across parts and a modestly colossal size of words.
The novel similarly relies upon different characters, trade, and laced events, inside a time span going from two or three hours to various years, true to form by the possibility of the events and the story complex to determine unequivocal issues. Hence, the first separates as shown by its focuses to:
The significant book: It relies upon the delegate perspective in suggesting the significance, as it doesn't address the focuses clearly or things being what they are, yet rather presents the issues inside a kind of questions and unclearness, so the ramifications come as a mysterious that requires significance from the peruser and a far reaching society that enables him to unwind them.
Dream novel: a fantasy novel relies upon presenting ludicrous stories and drawing in superb events solicitation to present philosophical observations about presence.
Examiner novel: a cunning game plans with human issues through the purposes of bad behavior and legal assessments, and it is habitually depicted by speed increment of events, mystery, and pressure. Regardless, this doesn't suggest that it is just a shallow show. Rather, various bad behavior books raise critical focuses about presence, man, moral inward voice, and other essential issues.
Unquestionable book: It is a unique considering a story emanating from evident events and real factors, through which the writer attempts to raise issues about the past and the present, and to interface the causes to the issues he wishes to examine.
The sincere book: generally speaking, the genuine novel presents a story about human selves and their relationship with the universe. It isn't just about heartfelt stories, yet opinion recalls human associations for general, even those that interface him to nature. However, this doesn't dismiss that an enormous part of such books interface with stories between two dears and screen their opinions and subtleties.رواية أنتيخريستوس
The functional book: The reasonable novel decides its plot and characters from this present reality, and we don't mean here that the events have truly occurred, yet rather it reproduces the nuances of society, its issues and nuances through and through and things being what they are, hence making some separation from imaginative brain, marvel, and dream.
There are various types of books, similar to the sensational novel, the astute that relies upon reasonable close to home portrayal, and various sorts.
It should be seen that the novel could have two particular sorts all the while. The writer mixes legitimacy and opinion, or among expert and the magnificent, and various undertakings at experimentation that authors keep on practicing in the midst of their works. رواية أنتيخريستوس
ٱ: Characteristics of the novel:Although savants have endeavored to portray the characteristics that perceive a made up work from other insightful works, through tries to decide a lot of notable points of view between books throughout the span of composing, these qualities stay subject to consistent endlessly change, as insisted by the most widely recognized approach to describing and gathering conceptual sorts.
Anyway, no matter what this, with respect to the novel, the going with characteristics can be perceived:
Imaginary works depend upon a story depiction of components, characters, places, as well as events and their viewpoints in the close to home setting.
When in doubt, the original depends upon the interconnection and repeat of events inside a schedule.