Conventional wisdom would send you to believe that a LSAT personal coach would be more expensive than an LSAT class. While this might be true in some circumstances, for the most part LSAT personal teachers are going to be individuals who have less cost to do business and admin costs; this permits personal LSAT teachers to provide their services at a drastically cheaper. Additionally, comparing a one-on-one session to a class is like comparing oranges to grapefruits. They aren't the same: a personal coach is better.
Cost to do business Costs
Large test prep companies like Kaplan and Princeton Review must pay for the CEO and other admin persons who help manage their corporation (the Kaplan CEO alone made approximately $100, 000, 000 before he resigned in 2008). They have office buildings that do not coach anyone, but are merely there to help organize the nationwide web of tutoring facilities. The rent, benefits, and paydays that are required for these entities are given to as higher costs to the students. To stay competitively priced, these companies spend just a fraction of their capital on developing study strategies for students. While a large company may spend $250, 000, 000 in advertising each year, each student is given the same lessons regardless of their skill while sitting in a class with 20 other students. This leads me to my second point.
LSAT Personal Teachers Have a Personal Approach
As a personal coach, I have met and taught dozens of individuals over the years. Each person has their own skills and personality; I've found that some strategies do not are well with certain people as they will with others. This is often true in life and even more so in education. Some people learn best by learning from mistakes while others learn by remark. The greatest benefit an LSAT personal coach can give to students is attention. Many people need the assistance of personal guidance, and a personal coach can provide just that. I have my own lesson plans and course outline, but I made it flexible 家庭教師 個人契約 マッチング enough to cater to your specific needs. I have a nearer relationship to my students than an LSAT teacher who is simultaneously teaching two classes of 20 students each can ever have. Large prep test companies seem expensive because they are. A personal coach can give you one-on-one lessons for the same cost as sitting in a class with 20 others.
Although recent rulings have changed how law schools view the LSAT, I would still advice that a student only take the LSAT once. It is a costly make sure the months spent studying for it can be long and arduous. Most of my students have taken an LSAT class, only to find the time and resources spent on the class insufficient to increase their scores. Some have been forced to await another everyone cycle and feel the LSAT preparation again, doubling their costs and wasting an entire year. While cookie-cutter strategies might be effective for some, the majority of students are looking for a helping hand to perform their full capacity on the LSAT. For students looking to do well, an LSAT personal coach is the cheaper and better alternative.